Skip to main content
Design proposal. This page describes how changes to programme rules and economic policy could be proposed, reviewed, and put into effect.

​
Scope and Authority

A proposal identifies the rule being changed, why the change is useful, and which participants, funds, or activities it would affect. The programme’s terms would define who can submit a proposal, who makes the decision, and who is authorised to carry it out. Different matters may involve different responsibilities. A token holding alone does not establish decision-making authority across RNDRNTWRK. For a programme using voting, the rules would explain eligibility, how votes are weighted, quorum, the decision threshold, and how abstentions are counted.

​
Policy Topics

The documented design uses four references to organise proposed changes. These names describe policy topics, not a deployed contract or interface. A proposal should show the existing rule alongside the requested change, including its effect on costs, agreed payments, committed funds, and unfinished activity.

​
Proposal Lifecycle

1

Describe the change

Identify the programme and policy topic. Set out the requested change, its purpose, the affected participants and resources, and the information needed to assess its effect.
2

Review and decide

Follow the programme’s stated decision rules. A voting process would record the eligible participation, vote weights, quorum, and result, including yes, no, and abstain responses.
3

Prepare the change

Identify who would carry out the decision and when it would take effect. The rules would explain any delay, pause condition, or recovery action, and who may use those controls.
4

Record what took effect

Connect the decision to the resulting policy version, effective date, and affected records. Distinguish an approved proposal from a change that has actually been applied.

​
Allocation Policy

Allocations start with a defined source of value and its obligations. Programme funding, service fees, settlement revenue, and token-related revenue keep their own records and allocation rules. The Public Corpus v1.1 planning model, dated 28 August 2026, assigns 20% of eligible recognised platform revenue to $555 buybacks after the source’s statutory, contractual, payment, refund, and other senior obligations have been met. That basis excludes gross transaction volume, user principal, creator and audience liabilities, restricted liquidity or route inventory, and borrowed or third-party capital. Remaining allocations depend on the source and economic lifecycle. This is a planned treasury policy, without a token-holder entitlement or a guarantee of purchases, liquidity, price, yield, or returns. Fee Distribution explains the allocation bases and planned source-specific models. A proposal needs to identify the exact source and policy it concerns.

​
Economic Programmes

Proposed staking commitments and release conditions belong to the programme’s economic terms. SW4P provides the settlement role. SW4P Earn extends SW4P’s economic model into source-aware allocation, claims, rewards, payout schedules, reserves, and reconciliation. Current status: SW4P Earn is not yet publicly available. No staking, liquidity, reward, or claim programme is currently open. A future programme would explain its commitments, release conditions, allocations, and decision rules before people participate. SW4P Earn describes the economic model; Creator Tokens covers proposed creator-specific participation and decision rights.