Documentation Index
Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.rndrntwrk.com/llms.txt
Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.
VAP v2: Research Design
VAP v2 is the next-generation proof layer for the RNDRNTWRK. After 14 weeks of research, the design has been validated with 234 tests passing and all 5 attack trees marked SECURE.Design Principles
Entity-Agnostic
Zero protocol components check entity type. No differential rates between human and AI participants. The protocol does not care what you are, only what you contribute and what you stake.Stake-Weighted Meritocracy
Participation requires skin in the game. Contribution quality is weighted by stake commitment, with diminishing returns to prevent plutocracy.Deterministic Economics
All economic parameters are formula-driven. No discretionary allocation, no manual intervention.Core Mechanics
Epochs
- Duration: 6 hours (4 per day).
- Boundary: Settlement occurs at each epoch boundary.
- Auctions: Advertisers bid for attention credits within each epoch.
Attention Credits (AC)
The atomic unit of verified attention.- Value: 1 AC = $0.001 USDC.
- Source: Burn $555 at oracle price to mint equivalent ACs.
- Usage: Bidding unit in epoch auctions for verified airtime.
The Burn Loop
Stake Model
Parameters
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Minimum Stake | 55,555 $555 |
| Weight Formula | ln(1 + S/27,778) |
| Weight Cap | 5.0 |
| Activation Period | 7 days |
| Maturation | 90 days to full weight |
Logarithmic Weighting
The formulaln(1 + S/27,778) ensures diminishing returns on additional stake:
- 55,555 $555 (minimum) → weight ~1.0
- 500,000 $555 → weight ~3.0
- 5,000,000 $555 → weight ~5.0 (cap)
ContributionProof
The v2 proof format is a 296-byte structure containing:- Session identifier and epoch reference.
- Stake reference and weight at time of contribution.
- Engagement metrics (hashed).
- Ed25519 signature.
Security Validation
Attack Tree Results
| Attack | Strategy | ROI | Max Advantage | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sybil | Split stake across identities | -81.7% | 1.80x at 100 IDs | SECURE |
| Fabrication | Generate fake engagement | -179.7% | N/A | SECURE |
| Collusion | Coordinate manipulation | Negative | Limited by stake | SECURE |
| Eclipse | Network isolation | Negative | Detected by epoch validation | SECURE |
| Griefing | Economic disruption | Negative | Self-harming | SECURE |
Why Sybil Fails
At 100 identities (the point of maximum Sybil advantage), the attacker achieves 1.80x return. But:- Each identity requires the minimum 55,555 $555 stake.
- 100 identities = 5,555,500 $555 at risk.
- The 1.80x advantage does not cover the opportunity cost of locked capital.
- ROI is -81.7% after accounting for stake requirements and gas costs.
Governance
VAP v2 introduces a three-layer governance model:1. ve$555 DAO
Token-weighted governance for protocol-level decisions:- Epoch duration adjustments.
- Fee schedule changes.
- Minimum stake thresholds.
2. Algorithmic Layer
Automated parameter adjustment within DAO-set bounds:- Dynamic difficulty adjustment based on network load.
- Automatic stake weight recalculation.
3. Alice Layer
Real-time operational decisions within algorithmic bounds:- Ad placement timing optimization.
- Engagement signal weighting.
- Anomaly detection and response.
Migration Path
v1 → v2 migration will be phased:- Parallel Run: v2 runs alongside v1, validating results match.
- Gradual Migration: Traffic shifted from v1 to v2 incrementally.
- Sunset: v1 deprecated once v2 is stable in production.